|Documents Home :: 3-5.93e :: prefer.html
The mechanics of the NTP algorithms which select the best data sample from each available peer and the best subset of the peer population have been finely crafted to resist network jitter, faults in the network or peer operations, and to deliver the best possible accuracy. Most of the time these algorithms do a good job without requiring explicit manual tailoring of the configuration file. However, there are times when the accuracy can be improved by some careful tailoring. The following sections explain how to do this using explicit configuration items and special signals, when available, that are generated by some radio clocks.
In order to provide robust backup sources, primary (stratum-1) servers are usually operated in a diversity configuration, in which the server operates with a number of remote peers in addition to one or more radio or modem clocks operating as local peers. In these configurations the suite of algorithms used in NTP to refine the data from each peer separately and to select and weight the data from a number of peers are used with the entire ensemble of remote peers and local peers. As the result of these algorithms, a set of survivors are identified which can presumably provide the most reliable and accurate time. Ordinarily, the individual clock offsets of the survivors are combined on a weighted average basis to produce an offset used to control the system clock.
However, because of small but significant systematic time offsets between the survivors, it is in general not possible to achieve the lowest jitter and highest stability in these configurations. This happens because the selection algorithm tends to clockhop between survivors of substantially the same quality, but showing small systematic offsets between them. In addition, there are a number of configurations involving pulse-per-second (PPS) signals, modem backup services and other special cases, so that a set of mitigation rules becomes necessary to select a single peer from among the survivors. These rules are based on a set of special characteristics of the various peers and reference clock drivers specified in the configuration file.
The mitigation rules are designed to provide an intelligent selection
between various peers of substantially the same statistical quality.
They is designed to provide the best quality time without compromising
the normal operation of the NTP algorithms. The mitigation scheme in its
present form is not an integral component of the NTP specification RFC-
1305. but is likely to be included in future versions of the
specification. The scheme is based on the concept of prefer peer,
which is specified by including the
prefer keyword with the
peer command in the
configuration file. This keyword can be used with any peer or server,
but is most commonly used with a radio clock. While the scheme does not
forbid it, it does not seem useful to designate more than one peer as
preferred, since the additional complexities to mitigate among them do
not seem justified from on the air experience.
The prefer scheme works on the set of peers that have survived the sanity checks and intersection algorithms of the clock selection procedures. Ordinarily, the members of this set can be considered truechimers and any one of them could in principle provide correct time; however, due to various error contributions, not all can provide the most stable time. The job of the clustering algorithm, which is invoked at this point, is to select the best subset of the survivors providing the least variance in the combined ensemble, compared to the variance in each member of the subset. The detailed operation of the clustering algorithm, which is given in the specification, is not important here, other than to point out it operates in rounds, where a survivor, presumably the worst of the lot, is discarded in each round until one of several termination conditions is met.
In the prefer scheme the clustering algorithm is modified so that the prefer peer is never discarded; on the contrary, its potential removal becomes a termination condition. If the original algorithm were about to toss out the prefer peer, the algorithm terminates right there. The prefer peer can still be discarded by the sanity checks and intersection algorithms, of course, but it will always survive the clustering algorithm. The prefer peer is used as long as it survives the sanity checks and intersection algorithm. If it does not survive or for some reason it fails to provide updates, it will eventually become unreachable and the clock selection will remitigate to select the next best source.
Along with this behavior, the clock selection procedures are modified so that the combining algorithm is not used when a prefer peer is present. Instead, the offset of the prefer peer is used exclusively as the synchronization source. In the usual case involving a radio clock and a flock of remote stratum-1 peers, and with the radio clock designated a prefer peer, the result is that the high quality radio time disciplines the server clock as long as the radio itself remains operational and with valid time, as determined from the remote peers, sanity checks and intersection algorithm.
In order to understand the effects of the various intricate schemes involved, it is necessary to understand some arcane details on how the algorithms decide on a synchronization source, when more than one source is available. This is done on the basis of a set of explicit mitigation rules, which define special classes of remote and local peers as a function of configuration declarations and reference clock driver type:
preferkeyword with the
peercommands. All other things being equal, this peer will be selected for synchronization over all other survivors of the clock selection procedures.
lockclockscheme, or another synchronization protocol, such as the Digital Time Synchronization Service (DTSS).
Reference clock drivers operate in the manner described in the Reference Clock Drivers page and its dependencies. The drivers are ordinarily operated at stratum zero, so that as the result of ordinary NTP operations, the server itself operates at stratum one, as required by the NTP specification RFC-1305. In some cases described below, the driver is intentionally operated at an elevated stratum, so that it will be selected only if no other survivor is present with a lower stratum. In the case of the PPS peer or kernel time discipline, these sources appear active only if the prefer peer has survived the intersection and clustering algorithms, as described below, and its clock offset relative to the current local clock is less than a specified value, currently +-128 ms.
The modem clock driver is a special case. Ordinarily, the update interval between modem calls to synchronize the system clock is many times longer than the interval between polls of either the remote or local peers. In order to provide the best stability, the operation of the clock discipline algorithm changes from a phase-lock mode at the shorter update intervals to a frequency-lock mode at the longer update intervals. If both remote or local peers together with a modem peer are operated in the same configuration, what can happen is that first the clock selection algorithm can select one or more remote/local peers and the clock discipline algorithm will optimize for the shorter update intervals. Then, the selection algorithm can select the modem peer, which requires a much different optimization. The intent in the design is to allow the modem peer to control the system clock either when no other source is available or, if the modem peer happens to be marked as prefer, then it always controls the clock, as long as it passes the sanity checks and intersection algorithm. There still is room for suboptimal operation in this scheme, since a noise spike can still cause a clockhop either way. Nevertheless, the optimization function is slow to adapt, so that a clockhop or two does not cause much harm.
The mitigation rules apply in the intersection and clustering algorithms described in the NTP specification. The intersection algorithm first scans all peers with a persistent association and includes only those that satisfy specified sanity checks. In addition to the checks required by the specification, the mitigation rules require either the local-clock peer or modem peer to be included only if marked as the prefer peer. The intersection algorithm operates on the included population to select only those peers believed to represent the correct time. If one or more peers survive the operation, processing continues in the clustering algorithm. Otherwise, if there is a modem peer, it is declared the only survivor; otherwise, if there is a local-clock peer, it is declared the only survivor. Processing then continues in the clustering algorithm.
The clustering algorithm repeatedly discards outlyers in order to reduce the residual jitter in the survivor population. As required by the NTP specification, these operations continue until either a specified minimum number of survivors remain or the minimum select dispersion of the population is greater than the maximum peer dispersion of any member. The mitigation rules require an additional terminating condition which stops these operations at the point where the prefer peer is about to be discarded.
The mitigation rules establish the choice of system peer, which determine the stratum, reference identifier and several other system variables which are visible to clients of the local server. In addition, they establish which source or combination of sources control the local clock.
disable pllin the configuration file. If the prefer peer is the modem peer, it must be the primary source for the reasons noted above. If the kernel time discipline is active, the system clock offset is ignored and the corrections handled directly by the kernel.
Most radio clocks are connected using a serial port operating at speeds of 9600 bps or higher. The accuracy using typical timecode formats, where the on-time epoch is indicated by a designated ASCII character, like carriage-return <cr>, is limited to a millisecond at best and a few milliseconds in typical cases. However, some radios produce a PPS signal which can be used to improve the accuracy in typical workstation servers to the order of a few tens of microseconds. The details of how this can be accomplished are discussed in the Pulse-per-second (PPS) Signal Interfacing page. The following paragraphs discuss how the PPS signal is affected by the mitigation rules.
First, it should be pointed out that the PPS signal is inherently
ambiguous, in that it provides a precise seconds epoch, but does not
provide a way to number the seconds. In principle and most commonly,
another source of synchronization, either the timecode from an
associated radio clock, or even one or more remote peers, is available
to perform that function. In all cases, a specific, configured peer or
server must be designated as associated with the PPS signal. This is
done using the
prefer keyword as described previously. The
PPS signal can be associated in this way any peer, but is most commonly
used with the radio clock generating the PPS signal.
In order to operate, the PPS driver must be enabled by the
enable pps command in the configuration file and the signal
must be present and within nominal jitter and wander error tolerances.
In addition, its associated prefer peer must have survived the sanity
checks and intersection algorithms and have become active. This insures
that the radio clock hardware is operating correctly and that,
presumably, the PPS signal is operating correctly as well. Second, the
absolute time offset from that peer must be less than
CLOCK_MAX, the gradual-adjustment range, which is
ordinarily set at +-128 ms, or well within the +-0.5-s unambiguous range
of the PPS signal itself. Finally, the time offsets generated by the PPS
peer are propagated via the clock filter to the clock selection
procedures just like any other peer. Should these pass the sanity checks
and intersection algorithms, they will show up along with the offsets of
the prefer peer itself. Note that, unlike the prefer peer, the PPS peer
samples are not protected from discard by the clustering algorithm.
These complicated procedures insure that the PPS offsets developed in
this way are the most accurate, reliable available for synchronization.
The PPS peer remains active as long as it survives the intersection algorithm and the prefer peer is active; however, like any other clock driver, it runs a reachability algorithm on the PPS signal itself. If for some reason the signal fails or displays gross errors, the PPS peer will either become unreachable or stray out of the survivor population. In this case the clock selection remitigates as described above.
Code to implement the kernel discipline is a special feature that can
be incorporated in the kernel of some workstations as described in the
A Kernel Model for Precision Timekeeping page. The discipline provides for the control of the local clock oscillator time and/or frequency by means of an external PPS signal interfaced via a modem control lead. As the PPS signal is derived from external equipment, cables, etc., which sometimes fail, a good deal of error checking is done in the kernel to detect signal failure and excessive noise. The way in which the mitigation rules affect the kernel discipline is as follows.
In order to operate, the kernel discipline must be enabled by the
enable pps command in the configuration file and the signal
must be present and within nominal jitter and wander error tolerances.
In the NTP daemon, the kernel time discipline is active only when the
prefer peer is among the survivors of the clustering algorithm, and its
offset is within +-128 ms, as in the PPS peer. Under these conditions
the kernel disregards updates produced by the NTP daemon and uses its
internal PPS source instead. The kernel maintains a watchdog timer for
the PPS signal; if the signal has not been heard or is out of tolerance
for more than some interval, currently two minutes, the kernel
discipline is declared inoperable and operation continues as if it were